Album thoughts

Was chatting (electronically) with our good friend Dave, and I thought I'd share some thoughts. Dave ( http://www.fatbwoi.com/ ) is a musician and producer who has very kindly begun to record our album for us, for those who don't know.

PLUG AHOY! :

Fatbwoi 5 are playing Glastonbudget this weekend, and gigging throughout the summer - a must-see show, so I urge you to see it, dear reader!

Anyway, I hope to have about 8 to 10 tracks in the "shops" (online) for xmas. Preferably xmas 2010. Dave as Fatbwoi is currently recording about 30 tracks for his own acoustic album. The Fatbwoi 5 have just released their excellent Relentless EP ( http://www.fatbwoi.bandcamp.com/ ). So I'd like to canvass the opinions of loyal readers - both of you!

Personally, I think you should mess about in the studio, not just slavishly record what you've got already. You make the recorded songs the best they can be, the album as a whole the best it can be, and you make the live performances the best they can be. But they don't have to be a faithful recreation of each other. You can add on parts in the studio if it sounds better, that you know won't happen live. Extra instruments or effects maybe. Doesn't matter about not recreating it live, live stuff will have the energy and volume and drama that you can't capture in the studio. Just as the full band and the acoustic versions are two different beasts, so the studio versions (band and acoustic) can add a further two beasts. It becomes an audio zoo, with a wide variety of beasts showing the wonder of "god's" creation. And I'm not comparing myself to god, I'm not saying that I'm god. That's for other people to say. (a Richard Herring gag there - aythankyew)

I'd quite like our album to have odd snippets and comments in between tracks if possible. Some throwaway remarks which made it to tape, or some very brief pieces of music, maybe. Then again, I may need to do a solo album for all the stuff the others reject, as I suspect they would with that idea! Something along the lines of The Who Sell Out or Ogden's Nut Gone Flake? Dark Side of the Moon even? That's the kind of thing I mean between songs, rather than Radiohead's Fitter, Happier (though I really really do like that track a lot) An album is not necessarily just a collection of songs, it can be a thing in itself which needs to be listened to as a whole. IPods and Shuffles, and even before them CD random sort buttons, have changed this. I rarely now listen to a whole album from start to finish - the technology just doesn't encourage you to do that any more.

In short, though, your album is your own album and is made primarily for you not the listener. So I hope we put together what we think is the best album we can, and give no thought at this stage to potential listener expectations. 

Confound them!

In both senses of the word 

That said, I now contradict myself, as comments are invited

I'm just curious, that's all 

Young Man Blues

Mose Allison wrote Young Man Blues when he was about 40. "Well a young man, he ain't nothin' in the world these days". The song laments that young men no longer have the respect, and older men have the power and money. A paean to teenage frustration and impotence.

Do Spotify (or equivalent) both his version with jazz piano, and The Who's version from Live at Leeds. Its a teenage anthem, and a call to arms against those who are too old to rock and roll.

Well now...

Rock and Roll has traditionally been the preserve of teenagers and very young men since its inception in the 1950s. With the exception of Bill Haley, of course, who was 29 in 1954 when he recorded Rock Around The Clock. Looked older than that, for me.

Jazz and Blues have always been happy to accept older performers - its more convincing to do world-weary in your 50's than in your teens perhaps - but rock and pop have always been a young person's game. If your parents don't hate it, its not rock and roll.

And the older bands get, the more they lose their mojo. Rock is anger and frustration and aggression. You calm down as you get older and the hormones settle down.

In my late 20s, I realised I was now too old to become a rock star, and gave up on the dream.

Recently though, I've begun to question this. Oh, not that I can seriously consider this band a career option. This band is 4 friends who enjoy playing together and putting on shows for their friends as a hobby. Its not that we're not good enough, I honestly think we make a really good band, but realistically nobody is going to buy our stuff in enough numbers to make any money out of it.

No, what I mean is this. Bands are hitting their peak and breaking through and being accepted much older now. Pulp released Common People after over 10 years together. Elbow, Doves, Seasick Steve even.

I believe there's a second age in life where there is a great deal of love, passion, uncertainty, anger, determination. And its your 30's and 40's. Puppy love, with its novelty, uncertainty, panic and insecurity, is replaced by parenthood. With it also comes a second age of anger, all-consuming love, break-ups, depression and all the other traditional emotions of rock music. It is still possible to be an "angry young man" in early middle age. There is a lot to be angry about if your life isn't turning out how you thought it would, and you're at the same time coming to terms with your own mortality and that of your parents.

And it needn't produce Dadrock, either. Sing along, everyone, I've got those residents parking permit blues! No, with a fresh wave of the traditional elements of rock and roll, older performers can create something genuinely moving, drawing on anger, frustration, birth, death, disillusionment, depression, unconditional love and all the rest of it.

We're not old, we're retro! And having seen a number of pub bands where we are old enough to be their fathers, I'm becoming increasingly convinced that many of them haven't been alive long enough to know what they're talking about. I don't mean to sound patronising or arrogant, but I am, so that's the way it comes out. We absolutely piss on most of the bands we play with. Not all, but most.

So don't write off older bands. We have more life experience to draw on in writing and in performance energy. We rock.

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange

Song title

If you can't live without me, why weren't you dead when I met you?
Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange

Boomshadow is not just a band, it is a way of life. This band is not a dictatorship, it is an equal democracy of four men. Because I say so. Though none of the others will be able to blog here as I speak for all. I assume they'd agree to that if I asked them.

Testing

Testing, testing
one two, one two